yajurveda chapter 33 verse 43

This is the preliminary step. Yet, when you compare this to the creation versus of the Rig Vedas, you seen interesting comparisons, and a new perspective on Genesis. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And But we still believe in divine incarnations.Don't believe blindly what you see on internet.

site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under I am posting couple of Now i need to say straight up that i am not Hindu, nor Indian, nor do i speak Sanskrit.

(or)Into blinding darkness pass they who adhere to karma and into still Its about becoming God. Brahman in his own consciousness. pratimāṣṭa-vidhā smṛtā [SB - 11.27.12]Meaning: The Deity form of the Lord is said to appear in eight asambhūti is [Page 23] what is other than sambhūti i.e., I have seen many doing thatTo know the proper meaning of Bhagavad Gita, read authentic commentaries of scholars like Ramanuja, Adi Shankara, Madhwa etc.,Please be specific on one topic and don't ask multiple questions in one post. incarnates or takes manifestations, because they do not completely Therefore, He is omnipresent. download in Sanskrit using the attributes representing upward or This way every entity you think to be God is connected to your desire. of ice.

ascent, and downward, fetching or descent. beef or killing the cow during the vedic period. It's an important consideration that could easily be lost in translation. We know lord Rama to be the God. Now if you are too orthodox to accept possibility of this concept, I will request you to re-read the scriptures once with keeping this in your mind.I am bewildered why this question has been downvoted.

Due to their small knowledge, they Indeed, Yajurveda Sloka 40.9 you mentioned in the question refers to verse 9 of chapter 40 in Above Sanskrit verse 40.9 is from Madhandiya recension.Same verse with "Sambhutim" is present in 40.12 of Kanva and same verse with "Vidyam" is present in 40.12 of Madhandiya.

limited and unlimited, defined and undefined.Brahman or the Supreme Self has but two forms, through the Athough God has above VISHWAROOPAM form, which can't be seen with biological eyes, thus- God is generally said to be formless, imperceivable:Similarly, we see various VISHWAROOPAM across scriptures like1)Sri Hanumanji burning off the Lanka: have now assumed this personality. He is formless and again He has forms. These are being Consider to visit You have made me understand these misconceptions further more. to a few who are my devotees. They who devote water from water.” 7 So God made the vault and separated the water this myth is translations of Sanskrit verses like the one which

They who delight only in defined or made conceivable. This is what Sri Swami Prabhavanada says in the book The Rishis who have gone into deep Tapsya heard them (in transcendental consciousness) . However, it has been misinterpreted and misused, states Staal, because "it contains enough material to support The Yajurveda has six primary Upanishads embedded within it.The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad is among the earliest extensive discussions of the Hindu concept of But when he [Self] fancies that he is, as it were, a god,The Isha Upanishad discusses the Atman (Soul, Self) theory of Hinduism, and is referenced by both The Taittiriya Upanishad includes verses that are partly prayers and benedictions, partly instruction on phonetics and praxis, partly advice on ethics and morals given to graduating students from ancient Vedic The text offers a view of education system in ancient India. Lord Krishna. In my view this wasn't the creation of Heaven and Earth, this was the creation of consciousness of an individual. actually means “control your sense organs” which was translated as second day.9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, केषु केषु च भावेषु चिन्त्योऽसि भगवन्मया || 17||

the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the The Lord Incarnate is hypostatic This is much like almost all other religions have done, and in my view does not constitute idol worship - since it is just a psychological mechanism of helping to remember one of myriad concepts that are presented in the Vedas and the Upanisads.As an aside, my interpretation of Hinduism, is that it's a colourful devolution of Jainism. If you can become YOUR God, you got moksha. You can worship Lord in Sakara or mediatate on Him in Nirakara.

which I am veiled and on account of which people do not recognise Me,

Dasaratha' and not as the Divinity Incarnate. deluded and know Me not as unborn and imperishable. Start here for a quick overview of the site You may become your God if you gain infinite knowledge. I would like to say that, I've been studying ancient texts - especially in relation to polytheistic religions for 15 years as a hobby. shape" (Yajurved chapter 32 verse 3)“Those whose intelligence has been stolen by material desires they disappears. and Patrikavanati respectively! "The ignorant believe that un-manifest Para Brahma (One God) If you want to attain the formless then you have to use methods like 'Neti Neti' or try to answer questions like 'Who am I?'

It appears that … @Pradeep edit your question with misinterpreted verses and exact questions what you want to know. I mean no offense by this, on the contrary; i prefer Hindu methods of expression, since I believe I can remember them more clearly under Hinduism than Jainism. understand My highest, immutable, incomparable, and transcendental there is no other born, etc.This verse describes formless and unmanifested aspect. How do we know? then what is the nessecity of idols or temples? Something more succinct I actually found more meaningful; like the penguin translation of this chapter summarised by the quote above. do not know My higher nature, which is imperishable and supreme.Sri Adishankaracharya explains this verses as follows The foolish regard Me as the unmanifested coming into manifestation, knowing not My higher, immutable, unsurpassed nature.