Roughly 18 months ago, the House passed the Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act, H.R.
Millions of Arizonans with pre-existing conditions will not forget how McSally has failed them over and again in Washington. Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. You would pay $ 0000. stated on April 8, 2020 an op-ed published in The Guardian: In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.
stated on May 11, 2020 comments in the Rose Garden: The ad accuses McSally of voting to “gut clean air protections.” Claim: “Of course I will always protect those with preexisting conditions. CALCULATE. “McSally’s vote would have negatively impacted communities already facing discrimination and health care disparities, including the LGBTQ community. "Martha McSally has in her actions, in her votes, been pretty consistent about cutting back benefits and trying to repeal the ACA without any clear plan in mind that would protect people who gained insurance through the ACA," Derksen added.
stated on April 27, 2020 comments made during a White House briefing:
Our Work
Fact Check: Ad goes after McSally’s record on environment, pre-existing conditions ABC15 fact checks new attack advertisement targeting Sen. Martha McSally. Now trailing behind rival Mark Kelly, the Arizona Senator’s healthcare record may be coming back to haunt her. Further, she has voted numerous times to take health care protections away from people with preexisting conditions. To learn more, please read our Privacy Policy. Summaries are written by Vote Smart's staff and interns, who adhere to the organization's strict policies and procedures in order to guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy.
The Human Rights Campaign uses cookies to improve your site experience. While addressing a group of Republicans, Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) revealed a growing concern that attacks on her healthcare record are hurting her fundraising efforts, according to a recording obtained by AZ Mirror. Douglas lied about McSally's health care record, falsely claiming McSally will "make sure that people with preexisting conditions are insured," despite McSally voting numerous times against protections for people with preexisting conditions. Always," the Republican said in a TV ad released June 22.The ad comes in response to criticisms by Kelly, who has highlighted McSally’s votes to undo the Affordable Care Act. "But nothing in her voting record, which tracks closely with the Republican repeal-and-replace philosophy, supports this claim. Contact
But independent experts told us that legislation doesn’t satisfy the standard she sets out.Only one national law makes sure people with preexisting medical conditions don’t face discrimination or higher prices from insurers. The summary does not necessarily reflect the content of the final version of the bill. HR 1190: Protecting Seniors' Access to Medicare Act of 2015 Status: House passed.
"Her words on preexisting condition protections don’t align with any votes I’ve seen. Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and state voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. stated on August 23, 2020 in an interview with ABC News: MARTHA MCSALLY. "Especially as COVID-19 cases climb, health care— and, in particular, the ACA — has emerged as a flashpoint in the Arizona election, said Dr. Daniel Derksen, a professor of public health, medicine and nursing at the University of Arizona. Says, "ObamaCare, which was flawed from the beginning, is collapsing under its own weight." The campaign didn’t specifically answer, but pointed to her general disapproval of the ACA. stated on February 19, 2020 comments during the February Democratic primary debate in Las Vegas: "Of course I will always protect those with preexisting conditions.
Further, she has voted numerous times to take health care protections away from people with preexisting conditions. Martha McSally (R): Repeal. stated on June 15, 2020 remarks during a roundtable discussion: Summaries are written by Vote Smart's staff and interns, who adhere to the organization's strict policies and procedures in order to guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. "No six-page bill is ever the way of achieving something," said Thomas Miller, a scholar at theMcSally has consistently declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying she doesn’t want to weigh in on "a judicial proceeding." The AHCA’s drastic changes to Medicaid would have likely stripped these people, and other vulnerable populations, of essential healthcare coverage.McSally’s pattern of not standing up for Arizonans and their health care is especially troublesome as America deals with the COVD-19 pandemic.