army military police pros and cons

The military can just create watchtowers and road blocks and various other check points wherever they please because they operate above usual civilian oversight.

Navy captaining my boat. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. However, the Army is filled with soldiers that have years of experience that if you ask, they will show the correct way of doing something. It also started getting the people who took advantage of the chaos to skip paying their taxes back into line.Obviously you don't want each of your soldiers as Law Enforcement Officers, basic military training can't/won't/shouldn't cover all the intricacies of the law and psychology that a LEO should be versed in. Detailed answers to any questions you might have

And Pros and cons of this? Using military units to do police work results in abuses by military and insurgency among the local population. You need to be resilient as challenges come often and Most are not easy. Another example would be the armed guards surrounding the African Rhinos. There is a vicious cycle where hostility by (a portion of) civilian population and to increasingly trigger-happy police continuously reinforce each other. It is entirely possible that your world, while heavily armed and violent, doesn't have a good concept of war.In such a world, if the need for a military were to arise, it would probably be met by the police.

Army Reserve soldiers serve one weekend per month and an additional two weeks each year. That is a major point: A mission statement is just worth nothing when you hope, or order, that two groups of people fight each other when they are I feel pretty save with how it is in Germany: There is the GSG9, the elite special forces of the federal police, and the KSK, the elite special forces of the army. This to keep their mission statements clear.The Police might be militarized and have things like full armor and solid equipment, but when it comes to war they will be a defensive force. If you want another analogy: police are like teachers in preschool, breaking up fights between kids; military are the security officer in the front, keeping drunks and perverts out.

The role of a militarized police force is to be a well-trained, well-equipped force that can deal with other well-armed groups and violent situations. That isn't what you are going for when a call comes in and you have only minutes to respond and you don't need a ton of firepower.The police can handle many kinds of incidents and are generalized while the military has specialists and is only suited to fighting. Can be hard at times with activations and assignments, but is worth the work and effort that is put into the job.Drill pay sucks if your in the reserves or guard if your looking for a paycheck definitely active duty is way to go way more advancement in active dutyEarly days and late evenings, depending on the job or location requirements. Their job functions vary and can include duties such as patrolling, writing citations, and arresting suspects. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Worldbuilding Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for writers/artists using science, geography and culture to construct imaginary worlds and settings. Compensation/Benefits. Some countries or towns limited who was allowed to carry what weapons (especially swords), but there was widespread training in stick fighting, wrestling and archery in the same way as we'd do Parkrun today. Their primary goal would be to evacuate the civilians, set up defensive area's to catch enemies that managed to pull through and organize+arm militia's that formed in the city.The military would just do what it does best, but can offload work to the Police and militia's when necessary.